BROUGHT  TO YOU  BY   RAJEEV BHATJIWALE

1.DULE SINGH  V/S  STATE OF M P-1999(1) J L J 69 ==

cause of incident mentioned in FIR but not revealed in court evidence the omission assumes  importance  version of FIR changed in the court evidence the prosecution case is doubtful. 

2.BRINDAVAN SINGH V/S STATE OF M P -1999(1) J L J 228==

the delay in reporting the first information report fully  explained -- convincing reasons given for the delay -- delay has no adverse consequences when the offence is of rape. as it has been held by the apex court in the case of state of Punjab v/s Gurmeet Singh AIR 1996 SC 1993. the Supreme Court held that even if there is some delay in lodging the first information report in respect of the offence of rape, if it is property explained and the explanation is natural in the facts and circumstances of the case, such delays would not matter.

3.ANIL KUMAR GUPTA V/S SATAE OF M P 1999(1)J L J-396==

the first information report recorded after seizure and weighing ganja -- crime number on the seizure memo and weighing panchnama is mentioned -- the prosecution case becomes doubtful.  It may be noticed that till the proceedings of weighing of ganja and preparation of seizure memo the offence was not registered and the first information report was not recorded in the circumstances dimension of crime number in the seizure memo and the weighing panchnama raises serious doubts regarding the proceedings

4. SHRILAL V/S STATE OF MP 1999(1)  J L J-365==

the first information report not proved by the writer, the signatures of the complainant also not proved cannot be treated as first information report even if it is marked as an exhibit.

STATE OF UP V/S NAHAR SINGH 1998 SCC (Cri)850

delay in filing of F. I R -- absence of cross-examination of an explanation of the first informant about delay in lodging the report -- evidence of the first informant remained unchallenged and, therefore, must be believed. in the absence of cross-examination of the explanation of delay, the evidence of the witness remained unchallenged and ought  to have been believed 

[ Home ] [ Up ]

Copyright © 2001 rajeev bhatjiwale
Last modified: March 22, 2001